1 |
On 8/10/10 4:22 AM, Eray Aslan wrote: |
2 |
> 1. Is this OK or should we file bugs against binaries in {/bin,/sbin} linking |
3 |
> against libraries in /usr/lib? Fix is relatively easy in general (give |
4 |
> --libdir=/lib against the config script) |
5 |
|
6 |
I'd suggest a fix that is guaranteed to work: make portage refuse to |
7 |
install anything in /bin that depends on /usr (based on say ldd check). |
8 |
|
9 |
> 2. Is the below acceptable? (symlinking from /bin to /usr/bin) |
10 |
> # ls -l $(find {/bin,/sbin}/ -type l)|grep /usr |
11 |
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Oct 28 2008 /bin/igawk -> |
12 |
> /usr/bin/igawk-3.1.6 |
13 |
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Aug 10 13:29 /bin/mail -> /usr/bin/mailx |
14 |
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Oct 28 2008 /bin/pgawk -> |
15 |
> /usr/bin/pgawk-3.1.6 |
16 |
|
17 |
I don't know the reason behind it. Both /usr/bin and /bin are in PATH... |
18 |
maybe for compatibility reasons. |
19 |
|
20 |
Paweł |