Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] The fallacies of GLEP55 | ||
| Date: | Sat, 16 May 2009 18:14:08 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20090516191400.2a435f3c@snowmobile | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] The fallacies of GLEP55 by William Hubbs |
||
| 1 | On Sat, 16 May 2009 13:10:07 -0500 |
| 2 | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > Agreed. The way I have always usedEAPI is, you set it once at the top |
| 4 | > of the EBUILD and you are done with it. As far as I know, there is no |
| 5 | > reason to change EAPI once it is set, and eclasses shouldn't be |
| 6 | > changing it. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | But eclasses have tried changing it. This is something people have |
| 9 | done, not some hypothetical. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] The fallacies of GLEP55 | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> |