Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v2]
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 05:43:39
Message-Id: 23061.3693.950900.181117@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v2] by "Michał Górny"
1 >>>>> On Wed, 22 Nov 2017, Michał Górny wrote:
2
3 > W dniu wto, 21.11.2017 o godzinie 22∶48 +0100, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller
4 > napisał:
5 >> > > > > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, Michał Górny wrote:
6 >> > > > > > It is an error for a single file to be matched by multiple
7 >> > > > > > entries of different semantics, file size or checksum values.
8 >> > > > > > It is an error to specify another entry for a file matching
9 >> > > > > > ``IGNORE``, or one of its subdirectories.
10 >> > > [...]
11 >> > Indeed, the second part of that sentence needs to change. Do you
12 >> > have a suggestion how to word it best?
13 >>
14 >> "It is an error to specify another entry for a file that matches
15 >> ``IGNORE`` or that is covered by an ignored directory."
16
17 > I'm not sure if 'covered' wouldn't be confusing here.
18
19 Indeed, that verb can have many meanings.
20
21 > Maybe:
22
23 > | It is an error to specify another entry for a file that matches
24 > | ``IGNORE``, or that is located inside an ignored directory.
25
26 > ?
27
28 Works for me.
29
30 Ulrich