1 |
On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 17:04:41 -0500 |
2 |
Austin English <wizardedit@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> From ec0be3d1a808ea0c5bdd081a4bb935f86bf78d44 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 |
5 |
> From: Austin English <wizardedit@g.o> |
6 |
> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 16:58:07 -0500 |
7 |
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] eclass/toolchain-funcs: add clang version functions |
8 |
|
9 |
Why do you even ask for review if you can't wait till the weekend |
10 |
before committing? |
11 |
|
12 |
I've already told you twice that I'm opposed to adding version querying |
13 |
functions for clang, especially for the use case you proposed. You |
14 |
should check for features, and not keep a huge list of supported gcc, |
15 |
clang, pathcc, icc... versions. With every random compiler pretending |
16 |
to be a random version of every other compiler. |
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
Best regards, |
20 |
Michał Górny |
21 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |