Archives
Archives
| From: | Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | foser@g.o | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer | ||
| Date: | Sat, 19 Jun 2004 23:25:19 | ||
| Message-Id: | 48811.205.241.48.33.1087687512.squirrel@spidermail.richmond.edu | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer by foser |
||
| 1 | foser said: |
| 2 | > On Sat, 2004-06-19 at 22:46 +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote: |
| 3 | >> 1. The ebuild maintainers should have the possibility to say: "ARCHs, |
| 4 | >> feel free to mark stable. All major bugs that i know of are closed, |
| 5 | >> only arch dependent bugs are left." |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > Ehm, this is basicly what I've said so far. And this point is when the |
| 8 | > maintainers arch goes stable. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Point. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | The problem comes in knowing what the maintainer's arch is. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | -- |
| 17 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |