| 1 |
Carsten Lohrke <carlo@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Donnerstag, 7. Juni 2007, Doug Goldstein wrote: |
| 3 |
> > That's exactly what I'm saying. CPV (Category/Package/Version) requires |
| 4 |
> > =, >=, <, <= to begin it. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> So you'd like to change every foo/bar occurrence (and that's the common case) |
| 7 |
> to >=foo/bar-0 !? Completely out of line, imho. I don't understand what the |
| 8 |
> fuzz is about. sys-fs/ntfs3g is absolutely fine. Fighting for the little "-" |
| 9 |
> is nonsense. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Um no. IF one specifies sys-foo/bar-3g you expect it to be a atom, else you |
| 12 |
have to prefix it with ">=" to be a CPV. If i choose to specify sys-utils/bar |
| 13 |
then i get any version of bar, which is fine. If i choose to specify |
| 14 |
sys-utils/bar-3 and bar-3 is not a valid atom, repoman cries at me. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Thus, you can continue using the tree just fine :) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
HTH, |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Regards, Matti Bickel |
| 21 |
Encrypted/Signed Email preferred |
Archives