From: | "Kevin F. Quinn" <kevquinn@g.o> |
---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o |
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Suggestion: INVALID -> NOCHANGE in bugzilla |
Date: | Sat, 24 Mar 2007 17:34:04 |
Message-Id: | 20070324183421.74cba29d@c1358217.kevquinn.com |
1 | People reporting bugs often get annoyed when their bug is marked |
2 | INVALID; especially when they're relatively new to the Gentoo |
3 | Experience. We've all seen it many times, I'm sure. |
4 | |
5 | Arguably no bug is invalid in the normal sense - if someone raises an |
6 | issue, they have an issue, regardless what we think of it. To that end |
7 | I'd like to propose bugzilla be reconfigured to use the phrase |
8 | "NOCHANGE" instead of "INVALID". NOCHANGE would indicate that whatever |
9 | the original issue, no change is needed on our part to resolve the |
10 | issue. |
11 | |
12 | Any reasons why this would be a bad idea? |
13 | |
14 | -- |
15 | Kevin F. Quinn |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion: INVALID -> NOCHANGE in bugzilla | Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion: INVALID -> NOCHANGE in bugzilla | Marius Mauch <genone@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion: INVALID -> NOCHANGE in bugzilla | Michael Cummings <mcummings@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion: INVALID -> NOCHANGE in bugzilla | Jim Ramsay <lack@g.o> |