Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Committing straight to stable
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 04:12:38
Message-Id: 426C6E38.7000409@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Committing straight to stable by "Robin H. Johnson"
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
5 > On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 07:04:58PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
6 >
7 >>Robin H. Johnson wrote:
8 >>
9 >>>You aren't the first no, but the solutions to it are limited:
10 >>>- teach developers to use -kb where they should
11 >>
12 >>Wouldn't it be -ko for a patch?
13 >
14 > -kb is actually better than -ko, due to how it's handled on later commits to a file.
15
16 Interesting. Thanks for showing this to us -- I checked the info and man
17 pages but didn't catch this section.
18
19 Thanks,
20 Donnie
21 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
22 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
23
24 iD8DBQFCbG44XVaO67S1rtsRAgM6AJ9BdqfhxjC7RxWGP5DtSH61A1ErewCg6pb0
25 7gNP2ffJMbU23UPrLYOQxZg=
26 =TkiD
27 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
28 --
29 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list