| 1 |
On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 16:07 -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote: |
| 2 |
> Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Saturday 05 August 2006 14:56, Stephen P. Becker wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> The metadata for sandbox suggests that it is under the control of the |
| 5 |
> >> portage team, even if they lack a herd: |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > ... because it is tightly integrated with portage ... there is the aspects of |
| 8 |
> > portage which require some sandbox env setup/etc..., then there is sandbox |
| 9 |
> > itself |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > but seriously, you've been around forever, you know this :p |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Of course I know this, and it sucks. If sandbox is so tightly |
| 14 |
> integrated with portage, then why *isn't* there a portage team member |
| 15 |
> who works on sandbox? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
cuz portage is a python beast and azarah wrote sandbox in c as a |
| 18 |
preload module. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
And really as Mike already pointed out the problem lies within the mips |
| 21 |
dynamic linker/loader.. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
| 26 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives