| 1 |
Chris Gianelloni kirjoitti: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 21:49 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Stefan Hellermann kirjoitti: |
| 4 |
>>> I've tried to not use the system-set and set up a virtual called |
| 5 |
>>> virtual/minimal-system which depends on all the packages I need (no gcc |
| 6 |
>>> or perl, only coreutils, glibc, baselayout and some packages that are |
| 7 |
>>> really needed for booting up). This is what I think should be the |
| 8 |
>>> system-set. And there would be a development-set which most people would |
| 9 |
>>> use, but don't have to. And maybe a set with packages like man, texinfo ... |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>> Probably would be useful to separate DEPEND and RDEPEND base systems. So |
| 12 |
>> things like gcc would only be needed for the DEPEND part. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Be careful with this one. Lots of things end up linking with libstdc |
| 15 |
> ++.so.* from GCC. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
virtual/libstdc++ similar virtuals could exist for other gcc parts that |
| 19 |
are needed at runtime. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Regards, |
| 22 |
Petteri |
Archives