Archives
Archives
| From: | Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | David Seifert <soap@g.o> | ||
| Cc: | Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>, base-system@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] savedconfig.eclass: clean up ED and EROOT usage | ||
| Date: | Fri, 24 May 2019 02:54:45 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAJ0EP43VxbjyZnaaHtv81phmokQMrryA_H9jeD-KnvwhKWdd_w@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] savedconfig.eclass: clean up ED and EROOT usage by David Seifert |
||
| 1 | On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 7:16 PM David Seifert <soap@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > Given that there are no ebuilds in the tree using this eclass and being |
| 3 | > in EAPI 0, 1 or 2 ( |
| 4 | > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/eapi-per-eclass/savedconfig.eclass/ |
| 5 | > ), wouldn't it make more sense to just whitelist EAPI >= 4 and clean up |
| 6 | > this backwards compatibility cruft instead? |
| 7 | |
| 8 | I'm fixing a bug with the least invasive change possible. I'm not |
| 9 | trying to rework the eclass. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] savedconfig.eclass: clean up ED and EROOT usage | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |