Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: esethome
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:17:10
Message-Id: 4FDB35AB.8060200@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: esethome by Mike Frysinger
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA256
3
4 On 13/06/12 04:51 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
5 > On Wednesday 13 June 2012 15:35:40 Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
6 >> --- user.eclass [some timestamp] +++
7 >> user.eclass.esethome [some other timestamp] @@ -388,3 +388,63
8 >> @@ }
9 >>
10 >> fi + +# @FUNCTION: esethome
11 >
12 > has to be inside the giant if block. so put this above the "fi".
13 >
14 >> +# @USAGE: <user> <homedir> +# @DESCRIPTION: +# Update the home
15 >> directory in a platform-agnostic way. +# Required parameters is
16 >> the username and the new home directory. +# Specify -1 if you
17 >> want to set home to the enewuser default +# of /dev/null. +# If
18 >> the new home directory does not exist, it is created. +# Any
19 >> previously existing home directory is NOT moved. +esethome() { +
20 >> _assert_pkg_ebuild_phase ${FUNCNAME} + + # get the
21 >> username + local euser=$1; shift + if [[ -z ${euser}
22 >> ]] ; then + eerror "No username specified !" +
23 >> die "Cannot call esethome without a username" + fi + +
24 >> # lets see if the username already exists + if [[ ! -n
25 >> $(egetent passwd "${euser}") ]] ; then
26 >
27 > "! -n" -> "-z" -mike
28
29
30 So outside of syntax issues like above, anyone have any issues with my
31 adding this to user.eclass ?
32
33
34 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
35 Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
36
37 iF4EAREIAAYFAk/bNaoACgkQ2ugaI38ACPAFRgEApwLkrsqSIW0nVK4l/dUTRzV9
38 ijEnbfa+BLc1skwfW4QA+gKgpmsz/K5VqXnVWyXocGqO98RYJL8lL3qm7k0Hs6uZ
39 =9i38
40 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----