Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o>
To: antarus@g.o
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 02:56:00
Message-Id: 20140120035446.063a31be@TOMWIJ-GENTOO
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights by Alec Warner
1 On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 17:24:30 -0800
2 Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > We almost never suspend commit rights. I'm not really finding a
5 > situation where this is necessary. Certainly not in the streamlined
6 > fashion proposed here.
7
8 Well, the QA team has been inactive for a while; so, I guess this
9 might have been a while back.
10
11 We for example have:
12
13 #gentoo-qa | * WilliamH has seen flameeys ask infra to lock people
14 out for a time before
15
16 But also:
17
18 #gentoo-qa | @hwoarang: pretty sure diego had the powerzz to suspend
19 people
20
21 Whether this has actually happened is something that is questionable;
22 but yes, one would have to agree that this was definitely streamlined.
23 The idea was on people's minds, probably because that patch was accepted
24 in one of the Council meetings; but streamlining of it never happened.
25
26 Hence the topic is brought up again here to make a decision final.
27
28 --
29 With kind regards,
30
31 Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
32 Gentoo Developer
33
34 E-mail address : TomWij@g.o
35 GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
36 GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies