| 1 |
Am Sonntag, 7. Mai 2017, 22:24:35 CEST schrieb Michał Górny: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> > Anyhow, I formally request the Council to vote on dropping these archs |
| 4 |
> > to unstable/exp profiles for the next Council meeting, explicitly |
| 5 |
> > overriding any arch concerns that are likely to awake now and going to |
| 6 |
> > be running around like headless chicken. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I'm against. Turning more arches into dev/exp only introduces hidden |
| 9 |
> depgraph breakages. I think it'd be better if we looked into |
| 10 |
> the arch.desc proposal and just disabled stable keywords for those |
| 11 |
> architectures. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
That's also what I would prefer (this is exactly what arches.desc is good |
| 14 |
for). |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
[I'm later going to make some updates over there taking the feedback into |
| 17 |
account.] |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Andreas K. Hüttel |
| 21 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 22 |
Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice) |
Archives