Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] useq and hasq
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 09:21:19
Message-Id: 4E16CBEB.8020506@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] useq and hasq by "Petteri Räty"
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA512
3
4 On 08/07/2011 12:09 ??, Petteri Räty wrote:
5 > On 8.7.2011 11.55, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
6 >>>>>>> On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Micha³ Górny wrote:
7 >>
8 >>>>> In [1] it is noted that the 'useq' and 'hasq' functions are
9 >>>>> "Deprecated". If this is the case, do we think it would be
10 >>>>> pertinent to have a repoman warning reminding people to switch to
11 >>>>> 'use' and 'has' respectively?
12 >>>>
13 >>>> Sounds good. One thing we could consider in future EAPIs is starting
14 >>>> to make deprecated functions die and then remove in the one after.
15 >>
16 >> And what would be the advantage of removing these functions? They have
17 >> zero maintenance cost (as already stated previously, see below).
18 >>
19 >
20 > Making sure people don't use them and through that removing the need to
21 > know what the two functions do from new people.
22 >
23 > Regards,
24 > Petteri
25 >
26 >
27 >
28 I believe that make them die wont improve anything but instead this will
29 bring more frustration to our users. If you make them die you transfer
30 the problem to the users, cause you make them file bugs and wait for
31 slacking maintainers to fix the packages. I would say to keep the
32 warning as it and hope that maintainers will actually step up and update
33 their packages.
34
35 - --
36 Regards,
37 Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
38 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
39 Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
40
41 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOFsvrAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCIr8P/i8nIP6wrTwWFufF+iBkO7/V
42 kPrG4A9IySSEO1/U5vowTdRCNG1joQxNGEawnT/TQRGT3ZVXQLUZcsJHOSzgGvTn
43 gYhGxBiu5AVlm4h4eP0bO89qqEcr7nvc9sA1tCSDog3vmVLQwimpjuBB1X4kDiYL
44 lSxgmqXFhHjWQxcklvRv4JFTrscybhk1IHMoYSanUscczwFgYrBHds9P9w+X9Fd0
45 W8R4BxounnZRFh1+MP4vBbF5FO0xuxjir8jaVq7uoZNbwsAagNNLLQjodc72TxtQ
46 LcgLXzsw5Xckz4qwQAo+muuPh9m60u1V3M2Dsu+RP8AG8XOQmOXnYVq+A/1cPwA8
47 8HdeZfs3R/bSpNYx/zL7G0kPRRCLDd/QfeX78UZMxsTyAhdCBKBaDkDn84UR9Zbm
48 eVGq2c9gHOy89DRkDwKnS0dg2ltTJIKOB3WVzsZ1nDpsuiv6t8FG0FE+ogwLZ9qn
49 ovOCPtH0DPCYwPKyeqNLv1cuQwUua5OlUvIYiZBPBft23DraNJariT4izDXms1G2
50 Z4x1U/Chn8vxB+AyceueNG86dUIgefBvbYyCFpT7IwX8bgrjf5/ZQ5LHUt2MyF6k
51 OuN5iTVTQiW7xP8eWilzOTiEnxuLy1NwgjNztdLppT9Q7oQ1i3L3WuuQ6TDBWIFb
52 K9na5nmUcyHlimTPxLaV
53 =i0CL
54 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] useq and hasq Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>