| 1 |
On 20 May 2016 02:16, Mart Raudsepp wrote: |
| 2 |
> I would like if such a function would explicitly document that calling |
| 3 |
> this function means the caller should DEPEND on an awk provider. |
| 4 |
> Similarly, I would like that all ebuild that call 'sed' actually DEPEND |
| 5 |
> on sed, not just half of them. |
| 6 |
> I would also like that no ebuild would assume packages in @system to be |
| 7 |
> present, beyond those dictated by PMS (unpackers and such). |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
this is all a terrible terrible idea and has been hashed/explained a |
| 10 |
number of times on this list. have you ever tried looking at the tools |
| 11 |
configure scripts run ? |
| 12 |
-mike |
Archives