| 1 |
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:37:09 +0100 |
| 3 |
> Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> > media-video/mplayer2 or media-video/mpv may be used as a more |
| 6 |
>> > modern replacement. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> Don't recommend mplayer2, afaik it's dead. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Also, I'd drop "modern" from there: I don't see much more modernity in |
| 11 |
> those forks except maybe younger maintainers :) |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Is there an exhaustive list of packages that don't work with one or |
| 15 |
the other? I don't think I've noticed anything I couldn't install for |
| 16 |
a lack of libav. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I suggest just cutting the subjective parts out of the last paragraph: |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Please also note that some packages support only one of the two |
| 21 |
implementations. An attempt to install one of those packages will result |
| 22 |
in blockers unless the user changes the global USE=libav state. The most |
| 23 |
notable example of such package is media-video/mplayer. media-video/mplayer2 or |
| 24 |
media-video/mpv may be used as replacements for users who prefer to use libav. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Rich |
Archives