| 1 |
Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:38:26 -0600 |
| 3 |
> Dale<rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> Michał Górny wrote: |
| 6 |
>>> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:14:52 +0100 |
| 7 |
>>> Enrico Weigelt<weigelt@×××××.de> wrote: |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>>> * Micha?? Górny<mgorny@g.o> schrieb: |
| 10 |
>>>> |
| 11 |
>>>>> Does working hard involve compiling even more packages statically? |
| 12 |
>>>> I guess, he means keeping udev in / ? |
| 13 |
>>> Because adding 80 KiB of initramfs hurts so much? We should then put |
| 14 |
>>> more work just to ensure that admin doesn't have to waste 15 |
| 15 |
>>> minutes to recompile the kernel (if necessary), create an initramfs |
| 16 |
>>> and add it to bootloader config? |
| 17 |
>>> |
| 18 |
>> 80Kbs? You sure about that? I somehow failed to mention this |
| 19 |
>> before. I noticed it when I saw another reply to this post. Reality |
| 20 |
>> check: |
| 21 |
> 80 KiB is enough for mounting plain /usr and booting with it. See |
| 22 |
> tiny-initramfs (but I haven't tested it thoroughly). |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
My plan is to have /usr on lvm. I think it will end up larger and it |
| 26 |
still adds one more thing to break. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
I really wish someone would get a better plan. I think I see a garbage |
| 29 |
dump ahead with lots of Linux distros headed that way. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Dale |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
:-) :-) |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Miss the compile output? Hint: |
| 39 |
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n" |
Archives