1 |
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 12:31 AM, Josh Saddler <nightmorph@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> Alec Warner wrote: |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Joe Peterson <lavajoe@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
>>> |
6 |
>>> Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
7 |
>>>> |
8 |
>>>> I actually object to having crap in dev-python, because things should be |
9 |
>>>> categorized functionally instead of by the language they're implemented |
10 |
>>>> in. 90% of the time you don't care about the language. But category |
11 |
>>>> moves are pretty much pointless, so I don't normally bring it up. |
12 |
>>> |
13 |
>>> Do you mean it is pointless because categories are pointless, or because |
14 |
>>> it is not worth the trouble of doing the move? I assume we inherited |
15 |
>>> the category idea from fbsd ports. |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> It is pointless because we should probably have tags; not categories. |
18 |
>> It is akin to the Section[1] header in a debian control file. |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>> [1] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-subsections |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Tags instead of categories . . . Now here's a very interesting idea, indeed. |
23 |
> Has there ever been a proposal like this for Gentoo? |
24 |
|
25 |
many times. |
26 |
|
27 |
> |
28 |
> I think we could improve on the Debian way of doing (sub)sections And I |
29 |
> think that a good system of tags would do better than most distros which |
30 |
> have a fairly limited set of arbitrary categories (like desktop, system, |
31 |
> utils; who knows what the heck those last two mean, anyway?) But blog-style |
32 |
> multiple tags might be very, very nice, if we could agree on a set of tags |
33 |
> to use, without trapping ourselves into some of the weirder categorization |
34 |
> used by other distros, like Slackware's arcane alphabetic system. |
35 |
> |
36 |
> Tags . . . I like the idea. I like it a lot. Thoughts? Exciting? Or is it an |
37 |
> old issue, and I'm 5 years late to the party. :) |
38 |
|
39 |
Probably more than 5... |
40 |
|
41 |
> |
42 |
> |
43 |
|
44 |
-Alec |
45 |
-- |
46 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |