| 1 |
30.1.2006, 12:46:28, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Monday 30 January 2006 16:43, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
>> On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 06:17:36 +0100 "Diego 'Flameeyes' Petteno" |
| 5 |
>> <flameeyes@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
>> | Also, as repoman complain about linguas_blabla not being a valid |
| 7 |
>> | useflags, all the linguas_* useflags should be listed in use.desc |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> No, part of the point of USE_EXPAND is that they shouldn't. This is a |
| 10 |
>> repoman bug. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Not only repoman - see Bug 70648 |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> I have yet to be enlightened on any merit of USE_EXPAND is so perhaps you |
| 15 |
> could explain as to why there should be user-configured-yet-undocumented |
| 16 |
> options for ebuilds? More precisely, how should they be documented if not |
| 17 |
> via use.desc? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Pretty much exhaustively flam^W discussed in Bug 70648 as well. LINGUAS are |
| 20 |
not use flags, otherwise they wouldn't have to exist. Sticking this stuff |
| 21 |
into IUSE just bloats it like hell, and as ciaranm pointed in another mail, |
| 22 |
maintaining lists of honored LINGUAS in each ebuild it just huge maintenance |
| 23 |
overhead with no gain... |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Best regards, |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Jakub Moc |
| 30 |
mailto:jakub@g.o |
| 31 |
GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
| 32 |
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
... still no signature ;) |
Archives