| 1 |
* William Hubbs schrieb am 01.08.11 um 19:49 Uhr: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 07:22:15PM +0200, Francesco Riosa wrote: |
| 3 |
> > everything about portage is very specific and should be separated, I |
| 4 |
> > would like to see an addition of one root directory "gentoo" where |
| 5 |
> > ${PKGMANAGER} keep all it's stuff. |
| 6 |
> > Some of these are already moveable with ${*DIR} variables in |
| 7 |
> > make.conf, others are not |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I don't agree that we should create a "gentoo" root directory; however, |
| 10 |
> to be technical, /usr/portage is wrong. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
That was exactly my point in one of my mails in the /usr-Thread. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I disagree with introducing a non-FHS dir on the rootfs, |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> I will list what My thoughts would be below your suggestions. Keep in |
| 18 |
> mind that this is just being thrown out there without thinking about the |
| 19 |
> details all that much. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> > 20K /gentoo/tmp |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Maybe /tmp? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Depends on which "kind" of tmp data this is. Should it survive a |
| 26 |
system reboot? If yes /var/tmp is better. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
I agree with the rest. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-Marc |
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
8AAC 5F46 83B4 DB70 8317 3723 296C 6CCA 35A6 4134 |
Archives