| 1 |
Since bug #540916 I have the feeling it is not clear to all |
| 2 |
developers that we must not rely on implicit eclass inherits. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
This has caused problems and breakage in the past and was even |
| 5 |
discussed in my recruitment process. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
If there are exeptions to this policy, then they have to be |
| 8 |
discussed and documented. Otherwise we should expect sane |
| 9 |
eclass dependencies from ebuilds without random assumptions. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Julian Ospald (2): |
| 13 |
Document policy of not relying on implicit eclass inherits |
| 14 |
Fix spelling |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
ebuild-writing/using-eclasses/text.xml | 10 +++++++++- |
| 17 |
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
2.2.1 |
Archives