Archives
Archives
| From: | "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Should portage tree CVS impose a commit moratorium during snapshot creation? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 09 Jan 2013 09:15:13 | ||
| Message-Id: | 50ED34ED.3010100@flameeyes.eu | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Should portage tree CVS impose a commit moratorium during snapshot creation? by Fabian Groffen |
||
| 1 | On 09/01/2013 10:09, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 2 | > Yeah, but I'd really appreciate it if they could stay for as long as |
| 3 | > we're on CVS, so my scripts that use the version number to retrieve |
| 4 | > diffs and apply them to the Prefix' tree versions keep on working. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Since we're discussing adding this on Portage side — why not having it |
| 7 | generate a per-package serial number instead? That could probably make |
| 8 | more sense for everything... |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes |
| 12 | flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Should portage tree CVS impose a commit moratorium during snapshot creation? | Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> |