Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept | ||
| Date: | Sat, 08 Sep 2012 06:47:46 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20120908074358.2250fb4f@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept by Michael Orlitzky |
||
| 1 | On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:55:10 -0400 |
| 2 | Michael Orlitzky <michael@××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 | > I think that dependencies are ultimately not hierarchical |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Situations like foo? ( bar? ( || ( a ( b c ) ) ) ) do happen, so any |
| 6 | new syntax would have to be able to deal with that. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | -- |
| 9 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept | Michael Orlitzky <michael@××××××××.com> |