| 1 |
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 21:16:13 +0100 |
| 2 |
Luis Ressel <aranea@×××××.de> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:18:55 -0800 |
| 5 |
> Raymond Jennings <shentino@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > As far as changelog generation, what about causing the changelogs to |
| 8 |
> > be autogenerated by the end user's computer? Divide and conquer. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> That would require a local git clone. And that's exactly what those |
| 11 |
> who still want Changelogs are trying to avoid. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Not only that, but their generation along with thick manifests are |
| 15 |
already quite resource intensive and time consuming for a relatively |
| 16 |
high powered server (a big reason behind this thread). |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Now make some older users system or low powered arm system do that with |
| 19 |
much lower resources and you are talking about a long time for |
| 20 |
completion. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Brian Dolbec <dolsen> |
Archives