1 |
Martin Schlemmer wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Sat, 2003-06-28 at 18:26, Daniel Armyr wrote: |
4 |
>> > My point is just this, you want access to -core, become a developer, |
5 |
>> > its part of the territory. |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> Yeah, and if I want to know how my government makes descisions on how my |
8 |
>> life is run I can allways become a high-ranking politician. At this point |
9 |
>> in time, Gentoo simply does not have an open culture, but a closed one. I |
10 |
>> am fore an read-only core, but when reading this thread I have a nagging |
11 |
>> suspicion that this is pointless. The Gentoo devs want to have an ivory |
12 |
>> tower, and ivory towers can not be scaled. The only way to change is for |
13 |
>> the inhabitants to come out freely. |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> > And I might be going out on a limb here, but I'm pretty sure that many |
16 |
>> > other non-profit Linux distributions have non-open lists. In fact, I |
17 |
>> > would be very surprised if any Linux distributions don't. |
18 |
>> |
19 |
>> And since then was that an excuse? I thought Gentoo wanted to be better |
20 |
>> than other distros. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> I am guessing you consult your children in all decisions you make |
23 |
> regarding them (if you have any)? Or if you are a manager, do you |
24 |
> consult with your workers in decisions you make ? |
25 |
> |
26 |
> |
27 |
|
28 |
nope but i tell them why i decided like i did and they know of every |
29 |
decision... |
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |