Archives
Archives
| From: | Philippe Trottier <tchiwam@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] A few modest suggestions regarding tree size | ||
| Date: | Sun, 17 Oct 2004 21:47:53 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4172E810.8040108@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] A few modest suggestions regarding tree size by Alan Frazier |
||
| 1 | Alan Frazier wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | >Luke-Jr <luke-jr@×××××××.org> wrote: |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | >>Ok, suggesting removal of dependency info has me convinced |
| 7 | >>this is a bad joke... |
| 8 | >> |
| 9 | >> |
| 10 | > |
| 11 | >The Force is not strong with this one. |
| 12 | > |
| 13 | > |
| 14 | For those with slow lines consider the snapshots ... |
| 15 | |
| 16 | If I am not totally farbot... |
| 17 | 16M @ 9.6k = 4.6 Hrs |
| 18 | 16M @ 57.6K = 46 Min |
| 19 | 16M @ 64K = 42Min |
| 20 | 16M @ 128K = 21Min |
| 21 | 16M @ 4M = 40 sec |
| 22 | 16M @ 10M = 16 sec |
| 23 | |
| 24 | I just did it in 4 seconds ... -burp- |
| 25 | |
| 26 | tchiwam |
| 27 | |
| 28 | -- |
| 29 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |