1 |
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 02:01:38PM +0200 or thereabouts, Thierry Carrez wrote: |
2 |
> > Does anyone have any (reasonable) objections to this? |
3 |
|
4 |
Nope -- I think it's a great idea. |
5 |
|
6 |
> |
7 |
> I think |
8 |
> |
9 |
> [ebuild U ] app-text/ghostscript 7.07.1-r3 -> 7.07.1-r5 |
10 |
> |
11 |
> would be easier to understand by a human and still machine-parseable. |
12 |
|
13 |
I like this modification a bit better. I'd also suggest that colors be used |
14 |
to further distinguish the two. |
15 |
|
16 |
Also, regarding breaking existing scripts vs. using a command flag, break |
17 |
the damn scripts. It's unreasonable to expect that scripts will *never* |
18 |
need updating and this change is being made specifically to make it easier |
19 |
for scripts in the future. Backwards compatibility is nice and all, but |
20 |
there's a reasonable limit. |
21 |
|
22 |
--kurt |