Archives
Archives
| From: | Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo Identity Provider | ||
| Date: | Fri, 22 May 2020 01:53:41 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAAr7Pr8PAyzuyPghqpz5QVYpo_m76ybQ3rSo1zHFcjzgFs8_Bg@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo Identity Provider by Samuel Bernardo |
||
| 1 | On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 5:46 AM Samuel Bernardo < |
| 2 | samuelbernardo.mail@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > On 5/19/20 7:47 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 5 | > > Do you have any specific solution in mind? |
| 6 | > > |
| 7 | > > [1] https://gitweb.gentoo.org/archive/proj/identity.gentoo.org.git/ |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > I would suggest for SSO an implementation like the following with LDAP |
| 10 | > provider: |
| 11 | > |
| 12 | > https://github.com/Luzifer/nginx-sso/wiki/Auth-Provider-Configuration |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Thanks for pointing this out, we might use it for legacy apps that don't |
| 16 | have solid saml / openid integration. |
| 17 | I want to link it against keycloak though because LDAP doesn't support |
| 18 | newer auth standards like u2f. |
| 19 | |
| 20 | -A |