1 |
Anthony G. Basile posted on Mon, 15 Sep 2014 17:43:09 -0400 as excerpted: |
2 |
|
3 |
> We could just push out the word that ChangeLogs are going away and they |
4 |
> have to read the git repo. That might be the easiest solution. I do |
5 |
> have users that quote my ChangeLogs though. |
6 |
|
7 |
As such a user... |
8 |
|
9 |
Given the proposed three-level system, dev-git, power-user-git, general- |
10 |
user-rsync, dumping changelogs in rsync is my preferred solution as |
11 |
well. Given power-user-git access I expect anyone who actually reads |
12 |
changelogs will be switching to the power-user-git level in a heartbeat, |
13 |
and I can't see the folks remaining on rsync actually caring about |
14 |
changelogs, either. In the one-off case they find themselves needing a |
15 |
changelog, they can read the git commit log online. |
16 |
|
17 |
When the discussion came up previously I was strongly in favor of keeping |
18 |
changelogs, because users /don't/ currently have a reasonable |
19 |
alternative. With the proposed three-level system, the power-user git |
20 |
repo will be that alternative, and the changelogs can simply go away in |
21 |
favor of people actually having access to a full git repo and git log. |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
25 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
26 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |