Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: My masterplan for git migration (+ looking for infra to test it)
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:11:10
Message-Id: pan$dbebc$d3b976ce$3dc67cef$d5c9fe68@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: My masterplan for git migration (+ looking for infra to test it) by "Anthony G. Basile"
1 Anthony G. Basile posted on Mon, 15 Sep 2014 17:43:09 -0400 as excerpted:
2
3 > We could just push out the word that ChangeLogs are going away and they
4 > have to read the git repo. That might be the easiest solution. I do
5 > have users that quote my ChangeLogs though.
6
7 As such a user...
8
9 Given the proposed three-level system, dev-git, power-user-git, general-
10 user-rsync, dumping changelogs in rsync is my preferred solution as
11 well. Given power-user-git access I expect anyone who actually reads
12 changelogs will be switching to the power-user-git level in a heartbeat,
13 and I can't see the folks remaining on rsync actually caring about
14 changelogs, either. In the one-off case they find themselves needing a
15 changelog, they can read the git commit log online.
16
17 When the discussion came up previously I was strongly in favor of keeping
18 changelogs, because users /don't/ currently have a reasonable
19 alternative. With the proposed three-level system, the power-user git
20 repo will be that alternative, and the changelogs can simply go away in
21 favor of people actually having access to a full git repo and git log.
22
23 --
24 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
25 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
26 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman