| 1 |
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 14:47, George Shapovalov wrote: |
| 2 |
> Wow, this came up once again *and* it got some notice this time, nice! |
| 3 |
> This is my big yes on this with a remark that this will also be usefull to |
| 4 |
> sort multiple packages under dev-libs. Some are more scientific and may |
| 5 |
> reside under app/sci/libs or some such, some belong elsewhere... |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I will make sure this gets added to the next complete rewrite of |
| 8 |
Portage, as well as many other things. However, for now, we should work |
| 9 |
within the existing cat/pkg structure. The "cat/pkg concept" is tightly |
| 10 |
integrated into the existing Portage code. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Best Regards, |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Daniel |
Archives