1 |
On 21/01/17 20:49, Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> Please review the following news item. It was requested by users. |
3 |
> Preferably I'd like to commit it today. |
4 |
> |
5 |
> -- |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Title: python-exec 2.3 reclaims python* symlinks |
8 |
> Author: Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> |
9 |
> Content-Type: text/plain |
10 |
> Posted: 2017-01-21 |
11 |
> Revision: 1 |
12 |
> News-Item-Format: 1.0 |
13 |
> Display-If-Installed: <app-eselect/eselect-python-20160206 |
14 |
> Display-If-Installed: <dev-lang/python-exec-2.3 |
15 |
> |
16 |
> The new versions of python-exec (2.3 and newer) are reclaiming multiple |
17 |
> Python-related symlinks in /usr/bin, most notably /usr/bin/python*. This |
18 |
> may result in your package manager reporting file collisions. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> The respective symlinks were previously either unowned and created |
21 |
> dynamically by app-eselect/eselect-python, or installed by it. From now |
22 |
> on, all Python-related symlinks are installed and handled |
23 |
> by python-exec. This ensures that they respect the python-exec |
24 |
> configuration files and variables consistently with regular Python |
25 |
> packages, and improves their reliability. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> If you are using FEATURES=collision-protect, Portage will reject |
28 |
> the upgrade. If this is the case, please temporarily switch to |
29 |
> FEATURES=protect-owned for the upgrade. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> If you are using FEATURES=protect-owned, Portage will verbosely warn |
32 |
> about the file collisions but will proceed with the upgrade once |
33 |
> determining no replaced files are owned. Please disregard the warning. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> The potentially colliding files are: |
36 |
> |
37 |
> * /usr/bin/2to3 |
38 |
> * /usr/bin/pydoc |
39 |
> * /usr/bin/python |
40 |
> * /usr/bin/python2 |
41 |
> * /usr/bin/python3 |
42 |
> * /usr/bin/python-config |
43 |
> |
44 |
> For more information on python-exec, please see: |
45 |
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Python/python-exec |
46 |
> |
47 |
> |
48 |
|
49 |
Thanks for writing this, looks good. |