Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for March

[Doug Goldstein]

Thomas Anderson wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 March 2008 14:59:55 Doug Goldstein wrote:
>
>> Thomas Anderson wrote:
>>
>>> On Wednesday 05 March 2008 14:41:32 Petteri Räty wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thomas Anderson kirjoitti:
>>>>
>>>>>> Please elaborate on how a "full.fledged developer" would differ from a
>>>>>> "package maintainer" technically. What requirements and/or
>>>>>> priviledges do you think could be reduced?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Marius
>>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps there could be some honor code system at least, where the
>>>>> package maintainer would be restricted to their area of maintainership.
>>>>>
>>>> This is the current situation.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Petteri
>>>>
>>> Exactly, only the "package maintainers" wouldn't have everything that a
>>> full dev would have...
>>>
>> What exactly wouldn't they get? What would differ them from Arch Testers?
>>
>
> Arch Testers don't have tree access. This proposal gives the package
> maintainer the ability to commit their changes.
>
>
So what you're looking for is committer ACLs. Gentoo's CVS currently 
does not use any form of ACLs to restrict access. This proposal would 
have to be discussed with the infra team to consider the feasibility to 
add ACLs to the tree.
-- 
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list