Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavoz@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Why arch-specific make.conf files?
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:21:21
Message-Id: 437B69F5.9020106@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Why arch-specific make.conf files? by Marius Mauch
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Marius Mauch wrote:
5
6 > Was just about to finally commit the elog related config stuff into
7 > make.conf just to notice (again) that there are 14 (in words: fourteen)
8 > different make.conf files there, with almost all of them just differing
9 > in CFLAGS and CHOST (only exception is make.conf.mac which isn't used
10 > anymore in any way AFAICT).
11 > From my POV those vars should be set in the profiles instead, and a
12 > quick scan shows that indeed most (maybe all? didn't count them)
13 > profiles set them already, so there isn't really a point in having them
14 > in make.conf too, except to make it easy for users to change them. For
15 > CHOST this seems to be a bad idea, not sure about CFLAGS.
16 > So what's the general opinion about this? Having all these different
17 > files makes it harder to add config changes, not by much but noticably,
18 > so personally I'd like to get rid of them, but if there is a good
19 > reason for them to stay I can live with that.
20
21 Speaking for the sparc swamp(tm) i wouldn't mind if CHOST went away from
22 make.conf* since people thinking "ohhh i have a sparc64" and modifying
23 them only causes trouble in the mixed user/kernel land we have.
24
25 - --
26 Gustavo Zacarias
27 Gentoo/SPARC monkey
28 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
29 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
30 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
31
32 iD8DBQFDe2n1V3G/IBCn/JARAjqEAJ99gBPAeVatWj0lgDclU3xYW6f3DwCePIwT
33 QswmG4b9eHFV48/APSdiJXw=
34 =SnPs
35 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
36 --
37 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list