| 1 |
On Thursday 31 March 2005 16:10, Fabian Zeindl wrote: |
| 2 |
> Are there anywhere more informations about OpenPAM? Because I read |
| 3 |
> several threads about problems with Udev and PAM's console.perms. There |
| 4 |
> are a few threads which suggest deinstalling PAM under Gentoo. |
| 5 |
See my email of just a minute ago about pam_console. |
| 6 |
console.perms is something related with pam_console which, as I said, is only |
| 7 |
a workaround which does more bad than good things atm. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I'd like to see it off-the-tree, but as this is not practical, moving it out |
| 10 |
of sys-libs/pam ebuild could be enough to have it safe for now. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Please note that is not enabled by default on recent systems. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
About removing PAM, it's not practical in a recent linux system, but maybe |
| 16 |
when openpam will be enough well integrated on gentoo it could be a good |
| 17 |
alternative as it's way lighter and minimalist. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò |
| 21 |
http://wwwstud.dsi.unive.it/~dpetteno/ |
Archives