| 1 |
On Thursday 22 April 2004 21:57, Jon Portnoy wrote: |
| 2 |
> As far as I know, repoman can't check reverse dependencies, meaning it |
| 3 |
> probably would not have caught this situation. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
It can if you do a scan of the full tree ... and it sounds like that this was |
| 6 |
one of those times when a full scan would have been worth the wait. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
How difficult would it be to make repoman do reverse scans? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Best regards, |
| 11 |
Stu |
| 12 |
-- |
| 13 |
Stuart Herbert stuart@g.o |
| 14 |
Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/ |
| 15 |
Missed the php|cruise? http://dev.gentoo.org/~stuart/cruise-2004/ |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
GnuPG key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu |
| 18 |
Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C |
| 19 |
-- |
Archives