1 |
okay, so what question did that answer? |
2 |
mozilla != netscape |
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
Jared H. Hudson wrote: |
6 |
> I think mozilla 0.9.9 is what most people build these days on Gentoo. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> -Jared H. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, John Dee wrote: |
11 |
> |
12 |
> |
13 |
>>One more question I've got. |
14 |
>>Would you guys be willing to replace netscape 4.x with netscape 6 as the |
15 |
>>default browser? |
16 |
>>Since netscape 4.x isn't really being maintained anymore (I do builds |
17 |
>>once a week, blah bleh), and the 6.x line is nscp's main focus, would |
18 |
>>you guys be willing to make netscape6 the default netscape browser? |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>>George Shapovalov wrote: |
21 |
>> |
22 |
>>>If you would like to see Netscape 6 in gentoo and are willing to spend some |
23 |
>>>time on it, please do contribute by any means. |
24 |
>>>Now to the technical stuff. |
25 |
>>>You do not need to know many details about portage code. What is getting |
26 |
>>>submitted is a set of build instructions wrapped in a bash script (and as |
27 |
>>>such, the tarball itself will not help much). |
28 |
>>>Please see: |
29 |
>>>http://www.gentoo.org/doc/gentoo-howto.html |
30 |
>>>for a description on how to create such an ebuild |
31 |
>>>(bash script (quite often very basic) containing install instructions). You |
32 |
>>>can also look at ebuilds for other packages. |
33 |
>>>The ebuild and any necessary supplementary files (patches, etc) are to be |
34 |
>>>submitted to http://bugs.gentoo.org, this page contains an ebuild submission |
35 |
>>>description: |
36 |
>>>http://www.gentoo.org/doc/ebuild-submit.html. |
37 |
>>> |
38 |
>>>If you still do not feel like creating an ebuild file (BTW you can always go |
39 |
>>>to #gentoo channel at irc.openprojects.net to get some real-time ebuild |
40 |
>>>creation assistance) you can instead submit build instructions and any url |
41 |
>>>pointers to bugs.gentoo.org as a feature request ( but this will take more |
42 |
>>>time to process for obvious reasons :)). |
43 |
>>> |
44 |
>>>George |
45 |
>>> |
46 |
>>> |
47 |
>>>On Friday 12 April 2002 11:32, John Dee wrote: |
48 |
>>> |
49 |
>>> |
50 |
>>>>I was looking at your netscape packages, and was wondering why you guys |
51 |
>>>>weren't using the 6.x series. The reason I ask, is that the 4.x series |
52 |
>>>>probably won't have another release (I'm the *NIX build engineer on the |
53 |
>>>>project). |
54 |
>>>>I'm also one of the build engineers on the 6.x project. |
55 |
>>>>Also, if needed, I could make a 6.x package for you guys. It really |
56 |
>>>>wouldn't take much to do. |
57 |
>>>>The only thing that might be a problem is the fact I don't know portage |
58 |
>>>>yet (I've been using gentoo a total of about 3 days). |
59 |
>>>>I *COULD* supply you guys with a tarball, and instructions, if you want. |
60 |
>>>> |
61 |
>>>>_______________________________________________ |
62 |
>>>>gentoo-dev mailing list |
63 |
>>>>gentoo-dev@g.o |
64 |
>>>>http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
65 |
>>> |
66 |
>>> |
67 |
>>>_______________________________________________ |
68 |
>>>gentoo-dev mailing list |
69 |
>>>gentoo-dev@g.o |
70 |
>>>http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
71 |
>> |
72 |
>> |
73 |
>>_______________________________________________ |
74 |
>>gentoo-dev mailing list |
75 |
>>gentoo-dev@g.o |
76 |
>>http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
77 |
>> |
78 |
> |
79 |
> |