| 1 |
On Wed, 2019-10-30 at 05:47 +1300, Kent Fredric wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 18:46:15 +0100 |
| 3 |
> "Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier" <contact@×××××××××.me> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > Wouldn't a Erlang project be better, specially as there is the Perl and |
| 6 |
> > Python projects which are there for probably the same reasons? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I think a "jabber" project would be a more suitable fit for this than |
| 9 |
> "erlang". |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Then perhaps there can be a subproject of "jabber" for "ejabberd". |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Why would you create another entirely useless artificial project nobody |
| 14 |
needs? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> "erlang" is probably too broad in scope. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> If there was an erlang project, then it might be sensible to have |
| 20 |
> "ejabberd" be co-maintained by erlang. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Best regards, |
| 25 |
Michał Górny |
Archives