| 1 |
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:58:13 +0100 |
| 2 |
Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 10:31:56 +0100 |
| 5 |
> Fabio Erculiani <lxnay@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > Portage can still take *minutes* to calculate the merge queue of a |
| 8 |
> > pkg with all its deps satisfied. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Half a minute if you disable backtracking which you don't need. :) |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Which sadly also means that some updates get skipped silently. (Those |
| 13 |
which would trigger rebuilds of other packages because of sub-slot |
| 14 |
deps, had that case yesterday). |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> > Ironically, launching the same emerge command twice, will take more |
| 17 |
> > or less the same time. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Determinism results in more or less the same time, that's correct; |
| 20 |
> proper benchmarks would show you a similar result. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I guess he means that the (according to the file sizes) extensive |
| 23 |
caching doesn't seem to be of much use. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Luis Ressel <aranea@×××××.de> |
| 28 |
GPG fpr: F08D 2AF6 655E 25DE 52BC E53D 08F5 7F90 3029 B5BD |
Archives