1 |
Hi Zac, |
2 |
|
3 |
Zac Medico wrote: |
4 |
|
5 |
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schaible@×××.de> |
6 |
> wrote: |
7 |
>> The most annoying fact is, that none of this would have been necessary |
8 |
>> with portage 2.2, but maybe we have to wait for 2.1.11.500 before 2.2 |
9 |
>> gets stable... |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Since portage-2.1.11.20 [1], you can do this: |
12 |
> |
13 |
> echo 'FEATURES="${FEATURES} preserve-libs"' >> /etc/portage/make.conf |
14 |
> |
15 |
> [1] |
16 |
> [http://blogs.gentoo.org/zmedico/2012/09/21/preserve-libs-available-in-portage-2-1/ |
17 |
|
18 |
That announcement slipped somehow my awareness. Indeed an upgrade of a |
19 |
different machine with preserve-libs added to FEATURES went fine. Still, I |
20 |
wonder what prevents portage-2.2 form going stable, I have one machine where |
21 |
I use that one for years without any flaws and a lot of benefits. |
22 |
|
23 |
- Jörg |