Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-p2p/transmission: transmission-2.12.ebuild
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:42:26
Message-Id: BANLkTinbM6h1zqnJRR9SYYvknQCEwJmqtQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-p2p/transmission: transmission-2.12.ebuild by Samuli Suominen
1 On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote:
2 > On 04/29/2011 09:26 PM, Mark Loeser wrote:
3 >> "Samuli Suominen (ssuominen)" <ssuominen@g.o> said:
4 >>> ssuominen    11/04/29 18:13:31
5 >>>
6 >>>   Removed:              transmission-2.12.ebuild
7 >>>   Log:
8 >>>   drop old, broken with stable libnotify
9 >>>
10 >>>   (Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha30/cvs/Linux x86_64, RepoMan options: --force)
11 >>
12 >> When removing an ebuild, please do document it in the ChangeLog.
13 >>
14 >> Thanks,
15 >>
16 >
17 > no thanks
18
19 Posts like these just make me want to unsubscribe.
20
21 Is there actually some debate as to whether ebuild removals should be
22 documented in the ChangeLog? Why shouldn't this be done? It hardly
23 takes any time at all.

Replies