| 1 |
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 04:30:30PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:25 PM, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 06:46:36PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> seems like a virtual that wouldn't do anything useful except pull in |
| 5 |
> >> random package(s) a la binary-distribution style |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > What about the stages? Don't we need some form of net support in |
| 8 |
> > stage 3? |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> That's debatable. For a typical install, the user has to install other |
| 12 |
> basic stuff like a boot loader, kernel, etc. So having them also |
| 13 |
> select a network config framework seems logical. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Is there a use case for a stage3 in which installing netifrc by hand |
| 16 |
> is impractical? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Personally, I don't know of one. Does anyone else? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
William |
Archives