1 |
Nathan Zachary posted on Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:29:52 -0400 as excerpted: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 14:21:07 +0300 Eray Aslan <eras@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> On 07/17/2012 02:00 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: |
6 |
>> > It may be a small issue, but since the potential pain is quite large, |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> Yes, that's the idea. |
9 |
>> |
10 |
> Considering Postfix is an MTA that is commonly used in production |
11 |
> environments, it is likely better to provide users with ample warning |
12 |
> than to risk the application failing and troubleshooting thereafter. |
13 |
|
14 |
I'd agree (tho I don't use postfix). |
15 |
|
16 |
Additionally, IIRC during a recent news item discussion someone said they |
17 |
believe if anything, we're underusing the news facilities. IDR seeing |
18 |
major disagreement, and I too tend to agree. They're one-shot unless an |
19 |
admin deliberately goes back to read them over and higher visibility than |
20 |
ewarns. |
21 |
|
22 |
Ewarns often appears every update for years, over sometimes a dozen |
23 |
updates, so even those like me that try to read them sometimes miss |
24 |
something new in the "noise" of messages we've seen over and over and |
25 |
over and over and over. |
26 |
|
27 |
Of course, the visibility filtering for news items was deliberately |
28 |
designed to help avoid that, and as long as news items /remain/ single- |
29 |
shot, not getting abused to appear over and over (or we'd need yet |
30 |
another layer to stand out from that noise), certainly, from current |
31 |
levels I really do think we could easily double or more the frequency, |
32 |
without being too annoying/abusive. |
33 |
|
34 |
So yeah, this one might be a relatively small thing, but with this sort |
35 |
of package a single person missing a single warning can mean a service |
36 |
outage for dozens or hundreds, so I think it's worth it. And since only |
37 |
postfix users who haven't upgraded yet will see it, and then only once, |
38 |
yes, do it. |
39 |
|
40 |
-- |
41 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
42 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
43 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |