Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu>
To: "gentoo-dev@l.g.o" <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Package removal without proper last-riting
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 19:45:39
Message-Id: CAHcsgXRk_XtxcUoBssaOiZWVOuFSwL5TBFYX2RS+9WF9THvCYg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Package removal without proper last-riting by Ryan Hill
1 On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> wrote:
2
3 > I wasn't aware last-riting had become general policy. It was originally
4 > started by the treecleaner team to give people time to object to
5 > maintainer-needed removals, and others thought it was a good idea, but it
6 > was
7 > always up to the discretion of the maintainer back then.
8 >
9
10 Last riting predates treecleaners by quite a bit.
11
12
13 Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
14 flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/