| 1 |
On 25/09/13 11:06, Thomas Sachau wrote: |
| 2 |
> William Hubbs schrieb: |
| 3 |
>> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 02:55:49AM +0200, Tom Wijsman wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> Makes me wonder if the "Why?" question should be left unanswered; I'm |
| 5 |
>>> also not quite sure if we can produce a short answer, can the actual |
| 6 |
>>> problem be summarized in one short clear sentence at all? |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> I will try, but not in this thread. I want this thread to stay focused |
| 9 |
>> on the news item. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> Here is the updated newsitem based on feedback I have received so far. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> William |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> What about busybox[sep-usr]? Is that still supported or is everyone with |
| 17 |
> separate /usr forced to use an initramfs? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I don't see how busybox[sep-usr] would fix the problem of |
| 20 |
net-wireless/bluez installing to /usr and bluetooth keyboards, or |
| 21 |
sys-apps/kbd installing keymaps to /usr, and so forth |
| 22 |
Should just declare it unsupported -- that's doesn't stop people from |
| 23 |
still using separate /usr. |
| 24 |
I think the point with declaring it unsupported is to let people know |
| 25 |
there will be issues, and they have to deal with them. |
Archives