| 1 |
On 04/15/2012 06:47 PM, Marcin Miros³aw wrote: |
| 2 |
> W dniu 2012-04-14 13:02, Pacho Ramos pisze: |
| 3 |
>> Hello |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> From time to time I see old bug reports that are still wrongly |
| 6 |
>> opened and referring to old packages no longer in the tree. Would |
| 7 |
>> be possible to add a way to periodically check for bugs referring |
| 8 |
>> in summary to obsolete packages and, then, allow us to have a |
| 9 |
>> cleaner bug list? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Hi, |
| 12 |
> what about siutation package was removed from tree. After sometime |
| 13 |
> other maintainer wants to put this package to the tree again, |
| 14 |
> shouldn't fix those bugs before doing this? |
| 15 |
> Marcin |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
When package foobar gets removed from Portage, the remaining bugs |
| 20 |
affecting foobar gets closed with resolution WONTFIX/OBSOLETE/FIXED |
| 21 |
depending on type of the bug. |
| 22 |
When package foobar gets readded to Portage, the maintainer needs to |
| 23 |
check also for closed bugs. |
| 24 |
That's how it is now, and the workflow wouldn't change with this proposal. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
So you are right, but irrelevant to the /topic in hand. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
- Samuli |
Archives