| 1 |
On 05/05/12 21:01, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 05/05/12 14:40, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> Hiya, |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> there's a growing culture of libreoffice extensions, and (with the help of an |
| 7 |
>> eclass prepared by scarabeus) it would be nice to get some of them into the |
| 8 |
>> portage tree. Now we have to decide where to put them. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> Suggestion: new category office-ext |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> What do you think? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> No preference myself, but we already have e.g. app-emacs and www-apache |
| 15 |
> which (I guess?) reflect the fact that emacs lies under app-foo and |
| 16 |
> apache under www-bar. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> That would suggest app-libreoffice? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
+1 on app-libreoffice if they are only for LibreOffice. Can those extensions |
| 21 |
work with app-office/openoffice-bin? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Krzysztof Pawlik <nelchael at gentoo.org> key id: 0xF6A80E46 |
| 25 |
desktop-misc, java, vim, kernel, python, apache... |
Archives