Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI checking in eclasses | ||
| Date: | Mon, 31 Dec 2007 15:10:08 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20071231150659.1672b45f@snowcone | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] EAPI checking in eclasses by Caleb Tennis |
||
| 1 | On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 09:34:05 -0500 (EST) |
| 2 | "Caleb Tennis" <caleb@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > Is it legal for an eclass to check the EAPI version (presumably by |
| 4 | > using the EAPI variable) and perform some dependent behavior based on |
| 5 | > what it sees? I don't see any eclasses using EAPI for anything, so |
| 6 | > I'm curious. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Yes, so long as that dependent behaviour isn't intended to indicate an |
| 9 | error. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |