| 1 |
On Friday 22 April 2005 10:03 am, Spider wrote: |
| 2 |
> Yes, Will you provide a migration phase? |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> That means, can you put busybox-shell to auto-conflict sash and |
| 5 |
> link /bin/sash to /bin/busybox-sh or what the binary is called? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
could be done |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> Oh, and unless you have another editor as binary built into your shell, |
| 10 |
> don't remove ed. A "trusted" editor is good. Sash is seldom used for |
| 11 |
> "My system is haxxored" however its often used for "I fucked up glibc" |
| 12 |
> and an editor is a handy thing, even if its as obscure as "ed" |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
busybox comes with vi ... i could implement ed in busybox, i'd just rather not |
| 15 |
have to ;) |
| 16 |
-mike |
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives