Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Replace 'sash' with 'busybox' as our static rescue shell
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:16:17
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Replace 'sash' with 'busybox' as our static rescue shell by Spider
1 On Friday 22 April 2005 10:03 am, Spider wrote:
2 > Yes, Will you provide a migration phase?
3 >
4 > That means, can you put busybox-shell to auto-conflict sash and
5 > link /bin/sash to /bin/busybox-sh or what the binary is called?
7 could be done
9 > Oh, and unless you have another editor as binary built into your shell,
10 > don't remove ed. A "trusted" editor is good. Sash is seldom used for
11 > "My system is haxxored" however its often used for "I fucked up glibc"
12 > and an editor is a handy thing, even if its as obscure as "ed"
14 busybox comes with vi ... i could implement ed in busybox, i'd just rather not
15 have to ;)
16 -mike
17 --
18 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list