RE: [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.46-r12

i think you will HAVE to unmask it...

see bug# 15284

the short version is that i was installing a new system and not only did i
hit the
stupid missing digest bug # 15280 it failed during "scripts/bootstrap.sh"

the fix was to unmask 2.0.46-r12...

(and i love the -vp feature - now if only ALL the ebuilds used IUSE properly
...)


-----Original Message-----
From: mikepolniak [mailto:mikpolniak@××××××××.net]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 11:30 AM
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.46-r12


On 16:21 Fri 07 Feb     , Rainer Groesslinger wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 06:29:24 -0600
> Nick Jones <carpaski@××××××.net> wrote:
>
> > I just pushed portage-2.0.46-r12 out. I need some testers on it.
> > It's mostly fixups on -r10/-r11 and should be free and clear of
> > problems now. I'd like to unmask this ASAP, so test and lemme know.
>
> I upgraded to 2.0.46-r12 a few minutes ago and I am merging gnome2.2 with
it ATM. No problems so far (~10 packages are already compiled).
>
> I even already found a bug because of the nice -vp thingy:
> -vp told me that atk-1.2.2 uses +doc then I did -doc and atk compiled
cleanly...Already filled a report on bugs.gentoo.org, of course ;)
>
> Keep on implementing such features ;-)

I think -vp lists the IUSE flags, which are optional depends.

The atk ebuild has IUSE="doc" and

DEPEND="${RDEPEND}
	doc? ( >=dev-util/gtk-doc-0.9-r2 )
	>=dev-util/pkgconfig-0.12.0"


--
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list